Olympus FE-47 vs Samsung SL202
93 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus FE-47 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 204g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-47 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus FE-47 versus Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the FE-47 (14MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe FE-47 was announced 11 months after the SL202 so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the FE-47 matches up against the SL202 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-47 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-47 and Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-47 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-47 over the Samsung SL202
| FE-47 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 | February 2009 | Newer by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus FE-47
| SL202 | FE-47 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus FE-47 and Samsung SL202
| FE-47 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display sizing | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus FE-47 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-47 has external dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-47 versus Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the FE-47 versus the SL202.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-47 and SL202 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Olympus FE-47 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by looking at technical specs. The pic here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-47 and SL202.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus FE-47 to give greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The newer FE-47 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus FE-47 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus FE-47 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Olympus FE-47 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus FE-47 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called as | - | PL50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-180mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.80 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204g (0.45 lb) | 168g (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $140 |