Olympus FE-47 vs Samsung WB250F
93 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Olympus FE-47 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 204g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus FE-47 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus FE-47 versus Samsung WB250F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the FE-47 (14MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FE-47 was announced 4 years before the WB250F which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the FE-47 grades against the WB250F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-47 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-47 & Samsung WB250F. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-47 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-47 over the Samsung WB250F
| FE-47 | WB250F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Olympus FE-47
| WB250F | FE-47 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 36 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-47 and Samsung WB250F
| FE-47 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus FE-47 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-47 features physical dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung WB250F has sizing of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-47 versus Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the FE-47 versus the WB250F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-47 and WB250F is 93 and 93 respectively.
Olympus FE-47 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The image below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-47 and WB250F.
Plainly, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures but you should really take the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged FE-47 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-47 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus FE-47 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Olympus FE-47 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus FE-47 | Samsung WB250F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-180mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.80 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204g (0.45 lbs) | 226g (0.50 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $250 |
