Olympus FE-47 vs Sigma Quattro
93 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Olympus FE-47 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 204g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-47 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Olympus FE-47 vs Sigma Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the FE-47 (14MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the FE-47 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FE-47 was introduced 7 years earlier than the Quattro which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-47 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the FE-47 scores versus the Quattro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-47 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-47 & Sigma sd Quattro. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-47 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-47 over the Sigma Quattro
| FE-47 | Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus FE-47
| Quattro | FE-47 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 74 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1620k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-47 and Sigma Quattro
| FE-47 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-47 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-47 has external dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-47 vs Sigma Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the FE-47 versus the Quattro.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-47 and Quattro is 93 and 63 respectively.
Olympus FE-47 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The picture below might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-47 and Quattro.
As you can see, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The FE-47 with its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Sigma Quattro will produce more detail using its extra 15 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged FE-47 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus FE-47 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus FE-47 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
| Olympus FE-47 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus FE-47 | Sigma sd Quattro |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 29 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 36-180mm (5.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.8 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | - |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 204 grams (0.45 lbs) | 625 grams (1.38 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $738 |
