Clicky

Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic FH22

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus FE-5010 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
30
Overall
34

Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs

Olympus FE-5010
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Panasonic FH22
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
  • Released January 2010
  • Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FS33
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic FH22 Overview

Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus FE-5010 versus Panasonic FH22, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the FE-5010 (12MP) and the FH22 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The FE-5010 was unveiled 12 months earlier than the FH22 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the FE-5010 scores versus the FH22 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Panasonic FH22

 FE-5010 FH22 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus FE-5010

 FH22 FE-5010 
ReleasedJanuary 2010January 2009Fresher by 12 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus FE-5010 and Panasonic FH22

 FE-5010 FH22 
Manual focus Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus FE-5010 enjoys exterior dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Panasonic FH22 has specifications of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus FE-5010 versus Panasonic FH22 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the FE-5010 against the FH22.

Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic FH22 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5010 and FH22 is 96 and 94 respectively.

Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic FH22 top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing specs. The visual below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5010 and FH22.

As you can plainly see, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Panasonic FH22 to provide more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older FE-5010 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic FH22 sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus FE-5010
Portrait photography with Panasonic FH22
21
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
28
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-5010 Street photography features
Panasonic FH22 Street photography features
66
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lighter than others (130 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
62
image stabilization (Optical)
includes touch focus
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-5010 Sports photography features
Panasonic FH22 Sports photography features
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no shutter priority
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
35
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
low fps (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-5010 Travel photography details
Panasonic FH22 Travel photography details
60
lighter than others (130 grams)
weather sealing
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low MP (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
67
includes touch focus
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-5010 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FH22 as a Landscape photography camera
31
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
42
really wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
manual mode not available
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus FE-5010
Vlogging with Panasonic FH22
28
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (130 grams)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external mic port
31
really wide (28mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-5010 and Panasonic FH22
 Olympus FE-5010Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus FE-5010 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22
Also referred to as - Lumix DMC-FS33
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2009-01-07 2010-01-06
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-180mm (5.0x) 28-224mm (8.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/3.3-5.9
Macro focusing range 3cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 5.80 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 130g (0.29 lbs) 170g (0.37 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $130 $200