Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM2
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d7a/99d7a0804ed60f6f44afcaa95ce459edbbe50dd6" alt="Olympus FE-5020 front Olympus FE-5020 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2009
- Also Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-PM1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Olympus FE-5020 versus Olympus E-PM2, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The FE-5020 was announced 4 years prior to the E-PM2 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the FE-5020 matches up against the E-PM2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 & Olympus PEN E-PM2. The whole galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus E-PM2
FE-5020 | E-PM2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus FE-5020
E-PM2 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 46 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus E-PM2
FE-5020 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-5020 has got exterior measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PM2 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-5020 versus Olympus E-PM2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the FE-5020 versus the E-PM2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58d8a/58d8adbdbe23f5d8367c80cd5c97a97b786fb5ee" alt="Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and E-PM2 is 95 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d6c0/8d6c08395a3f1a57b456345bcbec9fb8ca29d846" alt="Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specifications. The graphic below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5020 and E-PM2.
To sum up, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The FE-5020 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-PM2 will deliver greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older FE-5020 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2220/e2220194ab1bfdfa6d030890932eb6d38e0bc553" alt="Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/477c7/477c71c597d2ce8e7d2ca57d412a808fb05beba4" alt="Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Also Known as | X-935 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2013-05-21 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 137 gr (0.30 pounds) | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $160 | $448 |