Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Other Name is X-935
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe FE-5020 was launched 3 years prior to the TG-1 iHS which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the FE-5020 grades against the TG-1 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-5020 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| FE-5020 | TG-1 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus FE-5020
| TG-1 iHS | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 34 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| FE-5020 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-5020 features external measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the FE-5020 compared to the TG-1 iHS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and TG-1 iHS is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by going through specs. The image here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-5020 and TG-1 iHS.
All in all, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP and you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you may want to factor the age of the cameras into account. The more aged FE-5020 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Other name | X-935 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2012-05-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 610k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/500s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.10 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 137 gr (0.30 lb) | 230 gr (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $160 | $399 |