Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FX75
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also referred to as X-935
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Announced June 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus FE-5020 versus Panasonic FX75, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-5020 was launched 10 months before the FX75 so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the FE-5020 matches up versus the FX75 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Panasonic FX75
| FE-5020 | FX75 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus FE-5020
| FX75 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2010 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 10 months |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic FX75
| FE-5020 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus FE-5020 offers outside dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Panasonic FX75 has specifications of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-5020 versus Panasonic FX75 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the FE-5020 vs the FX75.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-5020 and FX75 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading through specifications. The visual underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-5020 and FX75.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Panasonic FX75 to resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures more aggressively. The older FE-5020 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Also called as | X-935 | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2010-06-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.10 m | 7.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 137 grams (0.30 pounds) | 165 grams (0.36 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $160 | $139 |