Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GH1
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
81 Imaging
49 Features
57 Overall
52
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GH1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 385g - 124 x 90 x 45mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Renewed by Panasonic GH2
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GH1 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GH1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the GH1 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and GH1 (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-5020 was announced at a similar time to the GH1 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GH1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple overview of how the FE-5020 matches up against the GH1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GH1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Panasonic GH1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Panasonic GH1
| FE-5020 | GH1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GH1 over the Olympus FE-5020
| GH1 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic GH1
| FE-5020 | GH1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2009 |  | July 2009 | Same age |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GH1 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-5020 features outside measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Panasonic GH1 has proportions of 124mm x 90mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 1.8") along with a weight of 385 grams (0.85 lbs).
Check out the Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GH1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the FE-5020 versus the GH1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and GH1 is 95 and 81 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GH1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The visual here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5020 and GH1.
As you can plainly see, both cameras offer the same exact resolution albeit not the same sensor sizing. The FE-5020 includes the smaller sensor which will make achieving shallower DOF trickier.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GH1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic GH1 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 |
| Also called | X-935 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2009-07-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine HD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 18.89 x 14.48mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 273.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 107 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.10 m | 10.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 137g (0.30 pounds) | 385g (0.85 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 124 x 90 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 772 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $160 | $949 |