Olympus FE-5020 vs Pentax 645Z
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
49 Imaging
80 Features
74 Overall
77
Olympus FE-5020 vs Pentax 645Z Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Released July 2009
- Additionally referred to as X-935
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 204800
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1550g - 156 x 117 x 123mm
- Announced April 2014
- Succeeded the Pentax 645D
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-5020 vs Pentax 645Z Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Olympus FE-5020 and Pentax 645Z, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Pro DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and 645Z (51MP) and the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and 645Z (Medium format) come with totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-5020 was announced 5 years before the 645Z which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Pentax 645Z being a Large SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the FE-5020 grades vs the 645Z for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-5020 vs Pentax 645Z Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 and Pentax 645Z. The whole galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Pentax 645Z Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Pentax 645Z
| FE-5020 | 645Z |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax 645Z over the Olympus FE-5020
| 645Z | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2014 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 57 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3.2" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Pentax 645Z
| FE-5020 | 645Z | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Pentax 645Z Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-5020 enjoys outer measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Pentax 645Z has proportions of 156mm x 117mm x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") having a weight of 1550 grams (3.42 lbs).
Compare the Olympus FE-5020 and Pentax 645Z in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the FE-5020 compared to the 645Z.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and 645Z is 95 and 49 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Pentax 645Z Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through specifications. The pic below may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-5020 and 645Z.
Plainly, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The FE-5020 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Pentax 645Z will show greater detail with its extra 39MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Pentax 645Z Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus FE-5020 vs Pentax 645Z Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Pentax 645Z | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Pentax 645Z |
| Also called as | X-935 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Pro DSLR |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2014-04-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | PRIME III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Medium format |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 44 x 33mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 51MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 8256 x 6192 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 204800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 27 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax 645AF2 |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 6 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 0.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3.2 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.85x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.10 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync+Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, contrast-control-sync, high-speed sync, wireless sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/125 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p,24p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 137 grams (0.30 lbs) | 1550 grams (3.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 156 x 117 x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 101 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 4505 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 650 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI90 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
| Card slots | 1 | Two |
| Cost at launch | $160 | $5,024 |