Olympus FE-5020 vs Pentax WG-2
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus FE-5020 vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Launched February 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-5020 vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus FE-5020 vs Pentax WG-2, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and WG-2 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe FE-5020 was announced 3 years prior to the WG-2 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the FE-5020 scores against the WG-2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-5020 vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-5020 & Pentax Optio WG-2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Pentax WG-2
| FE-5020 | WG-2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus FE-5020
| WG-2 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 31 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Pentax WG-2
| FE-5020 | WG-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-5020 has outer measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Pentax WG-2 has proportions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Olympus FE-5020 vs Pentax WG-2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the FE-5020 compared to the WG-2.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and WG-2 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through specs. The photograph here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5020 and WG-2.
All in all, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Pentax WG-2 to provide extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older FE-5020 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus FE-5020 vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
| Also Known as | X-935 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2012-02-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.10 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 137 gr (0.30 lbs) | 192 gr (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $160 | $350 |
