Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also Known as X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- New Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus FE-5020 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-5020 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the FE-5020 grades vs the WG-4 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-5020 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| FE-5020 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus FE-5020
| WG-4 GPS | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 55 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| FE-5020 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-5020 offers outside measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus FE-5020 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the FE-5020 compared to the WG-4 GPS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and WG-4 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-5020 and WG-4 GPS.
Clearly, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to resolve extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Alternative name | X-935 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.10 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 137g (0.30 lb) | 235g (0.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $160 | $210 |