Clicky

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
20
Overall
28
Olympus FE-5020 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
62
Features
38
Overall
52

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Olympus FE-5020
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
  • 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
  • Revealed July 2009
  • Alternative Name is X-935
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Revealed February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sigma. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The FE-5020 was manufactured 5 years before the DP2 Quattro which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the FE-5020 grades vs the DP2 Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 FE-5020 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus FE-5020

 DP2 Quattro FE-5020 
RevealedFebruary 2014July 2009More modern by 55 months
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 FE-5020 DP2 Quattro 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-5020 has outside measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Look at the Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the FE-5020 compared to the DP2 Quattro.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and DP2 Quattro is 95 and 70 respectively.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Often, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through a spec sheet. The image underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5020 and DP2 Quattro.

Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The FE-5020 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will resolve extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
20
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
77
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Street photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography info
59
weather sealing
lighter than competition in class (137 grams)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
61
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Sports photography camera
24
weather sealing
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/500s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
47
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Travel photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography highlights
64
lighter than competition in class (137 grams)
weather sealing
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
53
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Landscape photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography advice
31
pretty wide (24mm)
weather sealing
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
59
you can focus manually
decent sized screen (3 inches)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Vlogging details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging details
28
pretty wide (24mm)
lighter than competition in class (137g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have mic port
9
can't shoot video
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-5020 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Olympus FE-5020Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus FE-5020 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Also Known as X-935 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2009-07-22 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-120mm (5.0x) 45mm (1x)
Max aperture f/3.3-5.8 f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/500s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.10 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Max video resolution 640x480 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 137 grams (0.30 lb) 395 grams (0.87 lb)
Dimensions 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LI-42B BP-51
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage xD-Picture Card, microSD -
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $160 $931