Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-935
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Revealed February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sigma. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe FE-5020 was manufactured 5 years before the DP2 Quattro which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the FE-5020 grades vs the DP2 Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-5020 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| FE-5020 | DP2 Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus FE-5020
| DP2 Quattro | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | July 2009 | More modern by 55 months | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| FE-5020 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-5020 has outside measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the FE-5020 compared to the DP2 Quattro.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and DP2 Quattro is 95 and 70 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through a spec sheet. The image underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5020 and DP2 Quattro.
Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The FE-5020 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will resolve extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Also Known as | X-935 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/500s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.10 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 137 grams (0.30 lb) | 395 grams (0.87 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-42B | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $160 | $931 |