Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony TX200V
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
96 Imaging
41 Features
48 Overall
43
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally referred to as X-935
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus FE-5020 versus Sony TX200V, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and TX200V (18MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-5020 was revealed 3 years earlier than the TX200V and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the FE-5020 scores against the TX200V with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The full galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Sony TX200V
| FE-5020 | TX200V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus FE-5020
| TX200V | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 | July 2009 | Fresher by 30 months | |
| Screen size | 3.3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Sony TX200V
| FE-5020 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus FE-5020 provides external measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has specifications of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-5020 versus Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the FE-5020 against the TX200V.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and TX200V is 95 and 96 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by looking through specifications. The graphic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-5020 and TX200V.
To sum up, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Sony TX200V to result in greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older FE-5020 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Also referred to as | X-935 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3.3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/500s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.10 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 137 grams (0.30 lb) | 129 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $160 | $500 |