Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM1
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dc20/6dc204eefb71a9ef5bae01d9c451d4e7b9454420" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM1 front Olympus PEN E-PM1 front"
89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed November 2011
- Replacement is Olympus E-PM2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM1 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM1, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E-PM1 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M1 II was announced 4 years after the E-PM1 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the E-PM1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus PEN E-PM1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus E-PM1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-PM1
E-M1 II | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | November 2011 | More modern by 59 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
E-PM1 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-PM1
E-M1 II | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II has external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM1 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the E-PM1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2532a/2532acea12cf2de0bdd4c8d8553bc2956b13d242" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM1 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM1 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and E-PM1 is 68 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/956eb/956eb295b7502ea41c45dfd4f888d81ab9abaa58" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes just by checking a spec sheet. The pic here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and E-PM1.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus E-M1 II to give more detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/facea/facea29f2b50e20cfff411ecbfc5bbe95c9b758e" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5df/be5dfba24ca3e7ed181be1945551e981c5fc4550" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PM1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PM1 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2011-11-23 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 265 gr (0.58 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 52 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 21.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 499 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 330 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $499 |