Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49476/49476823376bf1f79d845d8994f5bd8b0081bd2b" alt="Olympus SP-590 UZ front Olympus SP-590 UZ front"
72 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
- Replacement is Olympus SP-600 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Overview
The following is a extended assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are sold by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SP-590 UZ (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SP-590 UZ (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M1 II was launched 7 years after the SP-590 UZ which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-590 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-M1 II matches up against the SP-590 UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus SP-590 UZ. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus SP-590 UZ
E-M1 II | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 94 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-590 UZ over the Olympus E-M1 II
SP-590 UZ | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SP-590 UZ
E-M1 II | SP-590 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II features outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-590 UZ has measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II versus the SP-590 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef244/ef2445a9ebe4979e828a5f6abc44002cb396ad1b" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and SP-590 UZ is 68 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec84e/ec84e0fcc644a7072565e30a10478137ef913114" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions only by going over specifications. The picture here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and SP-590 UZ.
Plainly, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f525/0f525597e52877fd379465ddccb607d3a6bba544" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/387b7/387b71f56394665f7b6f38df5af300b8f2e27ae2" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SP-590 UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus SP-590 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus SP-590 UZ |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2009-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 15 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 8.00 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) | 413 grams (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | Single |
Retail price | $1,700 | $249 |