Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
90 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Launched February 2011
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SZ-10 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SZ-10 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M1 II was announced 5 years after the SZ-10 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-M1 II scores versus the SZ-10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus SZ-10. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus SZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus SZ-10
E-M1 II | SZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | February 2011 | More modern by 69 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Olympus E-M1 II
SZ-10 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SZ-10
E-M1 II | SZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II features physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus SZ-10 has dimensions of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II and the SZ-10.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and SZ-10 is 68 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The pic below will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and SZ-10.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will produce extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos way more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II should have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus SZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus SZ-10 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-4.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 7.10 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 215 grams (0.47 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 220 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Price at release | $1,700 | $300 |