Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c093a/c093ae2117bb68c7c1561b0f622d9b6a9250e7ec" alt="Olympus SZ-10 front Olympus SZ-10 front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Launched February 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SZ-10 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SZ-10 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M1 II was announced 5 years after the SZ-10 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-M1 II scores versus the SZ-10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus SZ-10. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus SZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus SZ-10
E-M1 II | SZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | ![]() | February 2011 | More modern by 69 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Olympus E-M1 II
SZ-10 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SZ-10
E-M1 II | SZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II features physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus SZ-10 has dimensions of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II and the SZ-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a82fa/a82fa8af2e10b7cbdbe8f795825744e77af3022a" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and SZ-10 is 68 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/022ed/022ed4439936d47f62f188a523e88e08986852d2" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The pic below will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and SZ-10.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will produce extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos way more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II should have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43591/435916871704c53ef9e455391439912a473f612b" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fef7/5fef790ee00770cdadd402ddc9a2dd8ed379a1ab" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-10 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus SZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus SZ-10 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-4.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 7.10 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 215 grams (0.47 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 220 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Price at release | $1,700 | $300 |