Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Olympus SZ-16 iHS front
Portability
89
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus SZ-16 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
  • Launched January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Overview

Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SZ-16 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-M1 II was released 3 years after the SZ-16 iHS which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-M1 II grades vs the SZ-16 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS

 E-M1 II SZ-16 iHS 
LaunchedSeptember 2016January 2013More modern by 45 months
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k460kSharper screen (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Olympus E-M1 II

 SZ-16 iHS E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SZ-16 iHS

 E-M1 II SZ-16 iHS 
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurements

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II features external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS has measurements of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II and the SZ-16 iHS.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and SZ-16 iHS is 68 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Sensor Comparison

Usually, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by checking specs. The pic below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and SZ-16 iHS.

All in all, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will give extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography highlights
Olympus SZ-16 iHS Portrait photography highlights
75
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
35
good megapixels (16MP)
has face detect focus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography features
Olympus SZ-16 iHS Street photography features
78
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
has touch focus
environment proof
lighter than average (574 grams)
great high ISO (25,600)
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (226 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Sports photography with Olympus SZ-16 iHS
74
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
high max fps (60.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
environment proof
has phase detect autofocus
terrible battery (350 CIPA)
42
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
has tracking focus
max frames per second very slow (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery life (220 shots)
has no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography advice
Olympus SZ-16 iHS Travel photography advice
72
lighter than average (574 grams)
environment proof
has touch focus
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
terrible battery (350 CIPA)
65
lighter than average in class (226 grams)
good megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (25mm)
great reach (600mm)
missing Timelapse function
not so great battery life (220 per charge)
does not offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus SZ-16 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
76
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
great high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment proof
2 card slots
terrible battery (350 shots)
41
fairly wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
not so great battery life (220 CIPA)
missing Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging advice
Olympus SZ-16 iHS Vlogging advice
79
selfie friendly display
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection autofocus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
has external microphone support
lighter than average (574g)
31
fairly wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
lighter than average in class (226g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not offer selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SZ-16 iHS
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIOlympus SZ-16 iHS
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Olympus SZ-16 iHS
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2016-09-19 2013-01-08
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Max resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Min enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 60.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 gr (1.27 lb) 226 gr (0.50 lb)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 220 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Two One
Retail cost $1,700 $230