Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 6020

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
32
Overall
34

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Revealed September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Announced February 2010
  • Alternate Name is mju Tough 6020
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 6020 Overview

Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus 6020, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and 6020 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M1 II was announced 6 years after the 6020 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera.

Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-M1 II scores versus the 6020 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus 6020

 E-M1 II 6020 
AnnouncedSeptember 2016February 2010More modern by 81 months
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1037k230kSharper screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 6020 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus 6020

 E-M1 II 6020 

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6020 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus 6020 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II against the 6020.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 6020 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and 6020 is 68 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 6020 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes only by looking through technical specs. The picture here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and 6020.

As you can tell, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will result in greater detail with its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 6020 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 6020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography highlights
Olympus 6020 Portrait photography highlights
76
focusing manually
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
28
good megapixels (13MP)
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Street photography with Olympus 6020
78
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
features touch to focus
weather proofing
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
very good high ISO (25,600)
66
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
lighter than others (122 grams)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography information
Olympus 6020 Sports photography information
75
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
fast shooting (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
weather proofing
supports phase detect AF
not so great battery pack (350 shots)
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (13MP)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proof
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography info
Olympus 6020 Travel photography info
72
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
weather proofing
features touch to focus
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
not so great battery pack (350 CIPA)
70
lighter than others (122 grams)
weather proof
good megapixels (13 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography features
Olympus 6020 Landscape photography features
76
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
has double storage slots
not so great battery pack (350 per charge)
40
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (13 megapixels)
weather proof
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging details
Olympus 6020 Vlogging details
79
screen is selfie friendly
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focusing
great video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with microphone port
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
31
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (122g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus 6020 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus 6020
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIOlympus Stylus Tough 6020
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Olympus Stylus Tough 6020
Other name - mju Tough 6020
Type Pro Mirrorless Waterproof
Revealed 2016-09-19 2010-02-02
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 13 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 25600 1600
Minimum native ISO 200 64
RAW files
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 1,037 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 1/4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 4.00 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video format MOV, H.264 H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574g (1.27 pounds) 122g (0.27 pounds)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 2 One
Retail price $1,700 $279