Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
38
Features
33
Overall
36

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Released January 2012
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus TG-320, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TG-320 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TG-320 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M1 II was introduced 4 years later than the TG-320 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a short view of how the E-M1 II grades vs the TG-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus TG-320

 E-M1 II TG-320 
ReleasedSeptember 2016January 2012Fresher by 58 months
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kClearer display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 TG-320 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-320

 E-M1 II TG-320 

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus TG-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II and the TG-320.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and TG-320 is 68 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and TG-320.

As you can see, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II having a larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will resolve more detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II will have an edge in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Portrait photography camera
76
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
exports RAW formats
34
good MP (14MP)
provides face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography info
Olympus TG-320 Street photography info
78
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
provides focus via touch
environment sealing
lighter than average (574 grams)
great high ISO (25,600)
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
lighter than others in class (155 grams)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography highlights
75
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
environment sealing
comes with phase detect auto focus
low battery power (350 shots)
41
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
weather proof
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (150 shots)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Travel photography camera
72
lighter than average (574 grams)
environment sealing
provides focus via touch
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
selfie friendly display
low battery power (350 shots)
67
lighter than others in class (155 grams)
weather proof
good MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse function
terrible battery pack (150 CIPA)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography highlights
76
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
does not have low pass filter
great high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
2 card slots
low battery power (350 shots)
39
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
weather proof
lack of manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
terrible battery pack (150 shots)
lack of Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging details
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging details
79
selfie friendly display
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection focus
video res high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have external microphone support
lighter than average (574 grams)
32
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
lighter than others in class (155g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-320
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIOlympus TG-320
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Olympus TG-320
Class Pro Mirrorless Waterproof
Released 2016-09-19 2012-01-10
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 25600 1600
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW data
Lowest enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.7"
Display resolution 1,037k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Max quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 60.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 5.80 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lb) 155 grams (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photos 150 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 2 1
Price at release $1,700 $0