Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma SD14
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
59 Imaging
42 Features
30 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma SD14 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released February 2020
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Launched September 2006
- Previous Model is Sigma SD10
- Replacement is Sigma SD15
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma SD14 Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma SD14, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-70 (16MP) and SD14 (5MP) and the WG-70 (1/2.3") and SD14 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-70 was unveiled 13 years after the SD14 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD14 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the WG-70 grades vs the SD14 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma SD14 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-70 and Sigma SD14. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-70 Gallery and Sigma SD14 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Sigma SD14
| WG-70 | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2020 |  | September 2006 | Newer by 163 months |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 150k | Crisper screen (+80k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD14 over the Ricoh WG-70
| SD14 | WG-70 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-70 and Sigma SD14
| WG-70 | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma SD14 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-70 offers outside measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sigma SD14 has specifications of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") along with a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma SD14 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-70 vs the SD14.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-70 and SD14 is 91 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma SD14 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The pic here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-70 and SD14.
Plainly, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The WG-70 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Ricoh WG-70 will produce extra detail having an extra 11MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher WG-70 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma SD14 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh WG-70 vs Sigma SD14 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-70 | Sigma SD14 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Sigma |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-70 | Sigma SD14 |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2020-02-04 | 2006-09-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 5MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 150 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | On, off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 lb) | 750g (1.65 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $280 | $198 |