Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Following is a complete overview of the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-2 iHS, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M1 II was announced 3 years after the TG-2 iHS which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-M1 II grades against the TG-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-M1 II | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | June 2013 | More modern by 40 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 610k | Crisper screen (+427k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M1 II
TG-2 iHS | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-M1 II | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II offers physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has proportions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-2 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II against the TG-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4e11/c4e115eb04bfa6de149f369b200c9fcf23631e22" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and TG-2 iHS is 68 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdac9/cdac90af07e71392e45ad7bf72b4720562674b0a" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at specs. The image here might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and TG-2 iHS.
All in all, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you extra detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdc6d/fdc6deaf5634d4120e83090deb1dc072f982c6f3" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4d28/e4d28ea9d7f3e66572c2af9e19abfb64aa172d33" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2013-06-28 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 610k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 350 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | - |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $380 |