Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front
Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
42
Overall
38

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus TG-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
  • Announced June 2013
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview

Following is a complete overview of the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-2 iHS, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-M1 II was announced 3 years after the TG-2 iHS which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-M1 II grades against the TG-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus TG-2 iHS

 E-M1 II TG-2 iHS 
AnnouncedSeptember 2016June 2013More modern by 40 months
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k610kCrisper screen (+427k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M1 II

 TG-2 iHS E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-2 iHS

 E-M1 II TG-2 iHS 
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II offers physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has proportions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-2 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II against the TG-2 iHS.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and TG-2 iHS is 68 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at specs. The image here might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and TG-2 iHS.

All in all, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you extra detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-2 iHS
76
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focus
saves RAW formats
27
features face detect focus
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography features
Olympus TG-2 iHS Street photography features
78
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
offers touch to focus
environment proofing
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
above average high ISO (25,600)
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography details
Olympus TG-2 iHS Sports photography details
75
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
max frames per second high (60.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
environment proofing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
terrible battery (350 CIPA)
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking focus
environment proofing
better than average battery power (350 shots)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography advice
Olympus TG-2 iHS Travel photography advice
72
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
environment proofing
offers touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
terrible battery (350 shots)
68
better than average battery power (350 CIPA)
environment proofing
flash built-in
quite wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
does not have Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography advice
Olympus TG-2 iHS Landscape photography advice
76
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
environment proofing
two card slots
terrible battery (350 CIPA)
46
quite wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
better than average battery power (350 shots)
manual focus not available
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 II
Vlogging with Olympus TG-2 iHS
79
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focus
great video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
includes microphone socket
lighter than others in class (574g)
36
quite wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
does not have mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-2 iHS
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIOlympus Tough TG-2 iHS
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS
Class Pro Mirrorless Waterproof
Released 2016-09-19 2013-06-28
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW photos
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,037k dots 610k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology - OLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video file format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 pounds) 230 grams (0.51 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photos 350 photos
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots -
Card slots Dual Single
Retail cost $1,700 $380