Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-6
68 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Introduced May 2019
- Replaced the Olympus TG-5
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-6 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-6, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TG-6 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TG-6 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 II was manufactured 3 years earlier than the TG-6 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the TG-6 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-6 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus Tough TG-6. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus TG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus TG-6
| E-M1 II | TG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| TG-6 | E-M1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2019 |  | September 2016 | More modern by 32 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 1037k | Sharper display (+3k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-6
| E-M1 II | TG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-6 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus TG-6 has dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-6 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II against the TG-6.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and TG-6 is 68 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-6 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor sizes only by going through specs. The image below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and TG-6.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II because of its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide more detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images far more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 II will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-6 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Tough TG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus Tough TG-6 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2019-05-22 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 20.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) | 253 gr (0.56 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | 340 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) |
| Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $1,700 | $449 |
