Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-120
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-120 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-120 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus VG-120, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact and both are built by Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and VG-120 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and VG-120 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M1 II was manufactured 5 years later than the VG-120 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-M1 II scores vs the VG-120 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-120 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Olympus VG-120. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Olympus VG-120 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus VG-120
E-M1 II | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | January 2011 | More recent by 70 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Olympus E-M1 II
VG-120 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus VG-120
E-M1 II | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-120 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II has external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Olympus VG-120 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus VG-120 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the VG-120.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and VG-120 is 68 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-120 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by checking specifications. The visual underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and VG-120.
Plainly, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VG-120 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus VG-120 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus VG-120 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 7cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.40 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 120 grams (0.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 160 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 2 | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $190 |