Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ150
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7ede/f7ede6fb01dc789d04cdff238d6ba671579bc3cb" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 front"
67 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ150 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 528g - 124 x 82 x 92mm
- Introduced April 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ150 Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic FZ150, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FZ150 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FZ150 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M1 II was unveiled 4 years after the FZ150 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ150 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the FZ150 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ150 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic FZ150 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FZ150
E-M1 II | FZ150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | April 2012 | Newer by 55 months |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+577k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ150 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FZ150 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ150
E-M1 II | FZ150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ150 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ150 has sizing of 124mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 528 grams (1.16 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic FZ150 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II against the FZ150.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31794/317944a9218ebdf4990942617c53bbc022479bac" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ150 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ150 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and FZ150 is 68 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1feb/b1feb57064a47edc78e083d6f60f40113438990f" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ150 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ150 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ150 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by seeing specifications. The picture below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and FZ150.
Plainly, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II with its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide extra detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e24a5/e24a549685aa7f494d4c70ef28aca128ba084737" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ150 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ150 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ150 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ba0c/0ba0cba52a3c3497bdf0e074c59682dc7bdc915e" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ150 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ150 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ150 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2012-04-11 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 9.50 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) | 528 grams (1.16 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 124 x 82 x 92mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | 40 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 19.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 10.9 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 132 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 410 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $499 |