Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
65 Imaging
35 Features
64 Overall
46
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Introduced July 2012
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ100
- Successor is Panasonic FZ300
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ200, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M1 II was launched 4 years later than the FZ200 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-M1 II scores vs the FZ200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FZ200
| E-M1 II | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2016 | July 2012 | More recent by 51 months | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| FZ200 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ200
| E-M1 II | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ200 has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II and the FZ200.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and FZ200 is 68 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The photograph below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and FZ200.
As you have seen, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2012-07-18 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine VII FHD |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 1,312 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 13.50 m |
| Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 588g (1.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 80 | 37 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 19.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light score | 1312 | 114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 540 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Dual | Single |
| Pricing at release | $1,700 | $499 |