Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14531/14531b22504a4959f06ffa69a9ec4d9107943879" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front"
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Introduced July 2012
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ100
- Successor is Panasonic FZ300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ200, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-M1 II was launched 4 years later than the FZ200 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-M1 II scores vs the FZ200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FZ200
E-M1 II | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | July 2012 | More recent by 51 months |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FZ200 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ200
E-M1 II | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ200 has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II and the FZ200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae87c/ae87c1d7ed0899ccccc179c5e2e76901ec4755c4" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and FZ200 is 68 and 65 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/102a9/102a9a1d3da642425748f3637b81781812b1095a" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The photograph below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and FZ200.
As you have seen, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc723/bc723c81d6246ae394085ba82920507d4c17b8f8" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db941/db9418ea5558af9356a0b68b956e4e61a53dc8cb" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2012-07-18 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 1,312 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 13.50 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 588g (1.30 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 540 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | Single |
Pricing at release | $1,700 | $499 |