Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
64
Overall
47

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Introduced July 2012
  • Replaced the Panasonic FZ100
  • Successor is Panasonic FZ300
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ200, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M1 II was launched 4 years later than the FZ200 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-M1 II scores vs the FZ200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FZ200

 E-M1 II FZ200 
IntroducedSeptember 2016July 2012More recent by 51 months
Display resolution1037k460kSharper display (+577k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 FZ200 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ200

 E-M1 II FZ200 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFully ArticulatedFully Articulated display
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Selfie screen Both good for selfies

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ200 has measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II and the FZ200.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and FZ200 is 68 and 65 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The photograph below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and FZ200.

As you have seen, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic FZ200 Portrait photography highlights
75
manual focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
48
has manual focus
high flash sync (1/4,000s)
supports face detect focus
supports RAW files
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Street photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Street photography camera
78
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
comes with focus via touch
weather proofing
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
good ISO range (25,600)
57
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
heavier than others in class (588 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Sports photography with Panasonic FZ200
74
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet mode (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proofing
comes with phase detect AF
low battery (350 CIPA)
46
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking focus
good battery pack (540 CIPA)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography features
Panasonic FZ200 Travel photography features
72
lighter than competition in class (574g)
weather proofing
comes with focus via touch
resolution is good (20MP)
selfie friendly display
low battery (350 CIPA)
55
good battery pack (540 CIPA)
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
decently wide (25mm)
long zoom (600mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than others in class (588 grams)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography details
Panasonic FZ200 Landscape photography details
76
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
weather proofing
has dual storage slots
low battery (350 shots)
48
has manual focus
decently wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
good battery pack (540 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging advice
Panasonic FZ200 Vlogging advice
79
selfie friendly display
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection focusing
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have external microphone jack
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
63
decently wide (25mm)
selfie friendly screen
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
comes with mic port
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
heavier than others in class (588g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIPanasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2016-09-19 2012-07-18
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW photos
Lowest enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 121 23
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8
Macro focus range - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,037 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology - Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot 1,312 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Max quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0 frames per sec 12.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 13.50 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574g (1.27 pounds) 588g (1.30 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 37
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 19.1
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 10.8
DXO Low light score 1312 114
Other
Battery life 350 shots 540 shots
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Dual Single
Pricing at release $1,700 $499