Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ40
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8885a/8885a4e93f33c4e3d4295612c95591b63ab3d9ae" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 front"
68 Imaging
37 Features
40 Overall
38
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 494g - 120 x 80 x 92mm
- Released July 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ40, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FZ40 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FZ40 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M1 II was unveiled 6 years later than the FZ40 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ40 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the FZ40 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic FZ40 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FZ40
E-M1 II | FZ40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 76 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ40 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FZ40 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ40
E-M1 II | FZ40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ40 has measurements of 120mm x 80mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 494 grams (1.09 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ40 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the FZ40.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa1df/fa1dfee5c05c205d1e988a660d1ea6f8513e144b" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ40 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ40 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and FZ40 is 68 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcfbd/bcfbdf0ea4af1de66d59db1c8981b41bdd982e9f" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ40 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ40 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching technical specs. The graphic here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and FZ40.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II having a larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will render more detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4943b/4943b983bc17eb67b6cf21d8395ced95387f3049" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ40 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ40 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48b41/48b419d2760d50299e51e38bac2244391a87f8f7" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ40 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ45 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2010-07-21 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 9.50 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 494g (1.09 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 120 x 80 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $420 |