Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ70
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2340e/2340e2ff65ce46367e3d311e4c5a1941a6541467" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 front"
63 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 606g - 130 x 97 x 118mm
- Announced July 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ70 Overview
Here is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ70, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FZ70 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FZ70 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M1 II was brought out 3 years later than the FZ70 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ70 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-M1 II grades vs the FZ70 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ70 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Panasonic FZ70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FZ70
E-M1 II | FZ70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | July 2013 | Fresher by 39 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ70 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FZ70 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ70
E-M1 II | FZ70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ70 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ70 has measurements of 130mm x 97mm x 118mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 606 grams (1.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FZ70 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II and the FZ70.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb675/bb67528abead118547b7308c11bd2ce8d54053e0" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ70 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ70 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and FZ70 is 68 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be0c7/be0c74ae9026f0bc7f5715392e054db92c2484b9" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ70 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ70 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ70 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing just by going over specs. The photograph underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and FZ70.
All in all, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94ec6/94ec6c3508ebbf1ce9628bf7e39b2350b8a47d96" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ70 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ70 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ70 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57729/577294bb2fb389f63efa3b7bcf091ae9f6890d21" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FZ70 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2013-07-18 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 202 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 13.50 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (50i/60i, 25p/30p), 1280 x 720p (50p/60p or 25p/30p), 640 x 480 (25p/30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lb) | 606 gr (1.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 130 x 97 x 118mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | 41 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 19.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 171 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 400 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 2 | One |
Price at release | $1,700 | $300 |