Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS20
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
95 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 142g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FT20
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS20 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic TS20, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TS20 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TS20 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M1 II was announced 4 years later than the TS20 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic TS20 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-M1 II scores against the TS20 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS20 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Panasonic TS20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic TS20
E-M1 II | TS20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | January 2012 | More recent by 57 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS20 over the Olympus E-M1 II
TS20 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic TS20
E-M1 II | TS20 |
---|
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS20 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic TS20 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic TS20 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II vs the TS20.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and TS20 is 68 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS20 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by researching a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and TS20.
Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II should have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS20 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FT20 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2012-01-31 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1300s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.40 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 142g (0.31 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 250 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $179 |