Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS30
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7db5/b7db503a7349cf1460972c854f0bc8876af82b47" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30 front"
95 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 142g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2015
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FT30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS30 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic TS30, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TS30 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TS30 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M1 II was unveiled 21 months later than the TS30 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic TS30 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the TS30 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS30 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic TS30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic TS30
E-M1 II | TS30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2015 | More recent by 21 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS30 over the Olympus E-M1 II
TS30 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic TS30
E-M1 II | TS30 |
---|
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS30 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II has got physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Panasonic TS30 has dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic TS30 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 II vs the TS30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d46f/0d46f54785692c61f76b7a04aeddb90aea8dd735" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS30 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS30 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and TS30 is 68 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7d4a/a7d4a5ad8ecfe4a6c026b1372ab8b9be3ffca6d5" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS30 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS30 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS30 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor measurements only by looking at specs. The graphic below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and TS30.
All in all, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will give extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a90bb/a90bbf671de35a2f3fe59ad2a27de64bc5dce985" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS30 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS30 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55d62/55d621da5a04d6c0303c3e97b00963323c48954d" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic TS30 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FT30 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2015-01-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0fps | 1.3fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.40 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lbs) | 142g (0.31 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 250 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $180 |