Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS100
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc714/fc714eac2cd11c3cc555c53e8fdbf176379a4b0b" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 front"
87 Imaging
52 Features
65 Overall
57
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-250mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 312g - 111 x 65 x 44mm
- Released January 2016
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ100
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS100 Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS100, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the ZS100 (20MP) is very similar but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and ZS100 (1") come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M1 II was manufactured 9 months later than the ZS100 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS100 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-M1 II scores vs the ZS100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS100 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Panasonic ZS100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic ZS100
E-M1 II | ZS100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2016 | Fresher by 9 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS100 over the Olympus E-M1 II
ZS100 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper display (+3k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic ZS100
E-M1 II | ZS100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS100 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II provides physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS100 has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 312 grams (0.69 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS100 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II against the ZS100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9ad3/b9ad392d389f1e413bb35107395ffa9d3f4cb716" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS100 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS100 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and ZS100 is 68 and 87 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2faea/2faea1fa2b41a06210f5e2afa23c35a710663161" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS100 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS100 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS100 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and ZS100.
Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact MP but different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II has the larger sensor which will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult. The more recent E-M1 II should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4d41/e4d4110b3e88178599a78045d5596382e313ec19" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS100 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS100 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ecf1/3ecf1bc6aa7805673ee8c175c9ab3341abce714a" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS100 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ100 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2016-01-05 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 1,166k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0fps | 9.9fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 8.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 4K/UHD (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 @ 60p/60i/30p/24p, 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 312 grams (0.69 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 111 x 65 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 559 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 300 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 2 | One |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $700 |