Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS30
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25c20/25c200bbfc081616744826f0a4654558e906b113" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 front"
92 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 198g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Announced January 2013
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ40
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS25
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS30 Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS30, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the ZS30 (18MP) is fairly comparable but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and ZS30 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M1 II was launched 3 years later than the ZS30 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS30 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-M1 II grades versus the ZS30 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS30 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Panasonic ZS30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic ZS30
E-M1 II | ZS30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 46 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+117k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS30 over the Olympus E-M1 II
ZS30 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic ZS30
E-M1 II | ZS30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS30 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS30 has dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS30 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II versus the ZS30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5657e/5657eb239ee50ea26c562fadedeeebd57f82a9e2" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS30 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS30 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and ZS30 is 68 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ff96/0ff968a0379ce50f992307958b427f21195834bc" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS30 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS30 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS30 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The graphic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and ZS30.
As you can tell, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ed05/2ed05c93b276aa49b69f552f501bb3af1fb15dee" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS30 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS30 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a435/0a43543c0bec722e6d5bb108f1f3fc0137d53352" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS30 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ40 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 15 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 6.40 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) | 198 gr (0.44 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 260 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Price at release | $1,700 | $250 |