Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS50
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0f26/a0f260975b7fd3cfd965df18bc5d1244f1cf70fb" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
57 Overall
45
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 243g - 111 x 65 x 34mm
- Released January 2015
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ70
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS45
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS60
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS50 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic ZS50, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and ZS50 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and ZS50 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M1 II was announced 21 months after the ZS50 making the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS50 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-M1 II matches up against the ZS50 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS50 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic ZS50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic ZS50
E-M1 II | ZS50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2015 | More modern by 21 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS50 over the Olympus E-M1 II
ZS50 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper display (+3k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic ZS50
E-M1 II | ZS50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS50 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II provides physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS50 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II versus Panasonic ZS50 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the ZS50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0a89/f0a894d96bfac0bcd1e7fdac56bd8f0efa800b9c" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS50 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS50 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and ZS50 is 68 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d6be/8d6beb394d923a1c7576234b595617ba65349248" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS50 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS50 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS50 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching specifications. The picture here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and ZS50.
Plainly, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will render greater detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcb71/dcb71de22986a8ec7759d5c360ae2434e618577b" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS50 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS50 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee439/ee439916b05782c727bde5764b3efc6788ec902e" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic ZS50 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ70 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2015-01-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 1,166k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 6.40 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 243g (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 111 x 65 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | 44 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 11.2 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 138 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 300 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $350 |