Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax 645D
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
50 Imaging
76 Features
52 Overall
66
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax 645D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 40MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 1600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- No Video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1480g - 156 x 117 x 119mm
- Introduced March 2010
- Successor is Pentax 645Z
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax 645D Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax 645D, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Pro DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and 645D (40MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and 645D (Medium format) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 II was launched 6 years after the 645D which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax 645D being a Large SLR camera.
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-M1 II grades versus the 645D for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax 645D Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Pentax 645D. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Pentax 645D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax 645D
E-M1 II | 645D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | March 2010 | Newer by 80 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 921k | Sharper screen (+116k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax 645D over the Olympus E-M1 II
645D | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax 645D
E-M1 II | 645D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax 645D Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II features exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Pentax 645D has specifications of 156mm x 117mm x 119mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.7") having a weight of 1480 grams (3.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax 645D in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II versus the 645D.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and 645D is 68 and 50 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax 645D Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over specifications. The picture underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and 645D.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh tougher and the Pentax 645D will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 20MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax 645D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax 645D Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax 645D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax 645D |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro DSLR |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2010-03-10 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Prime II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Medium format |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 40MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 7264 x 5440 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax 645AF2 |
Total lenses | 107 | 6 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle and with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.85x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/125s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) | 1480 grams (3.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 156 x 117 x 119mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | 82 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 24.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 1262 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 800 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 2 | 2 |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $4,000 |