Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax VS20
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
90 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax VS20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-560mm (F3.1-4.8) lens
- 235g - 111 x 61 x 38mm
- Introduced January 2012
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax VS20 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax VS20, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and VS20 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and VS20 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M1 II was manufactured 4 years after the VS20 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax VS20 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-M1 II scores vs the VS20 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax VS20 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Pentax Optio VS20. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Pentax VS20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax VS20
E-M1 II | VS20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | January 2012 | Newer by 57 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax VS20 over the Olympus E-M1 II
VS20 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax VS20
E-M1 II | VS20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax VS20 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II provides exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Pentax VS20 has proportions of 111mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax VS20 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II vs the VS20.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and VS20 is 68 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax VS20 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing technical specs. The picture here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and VS20.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer you greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax VS20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax VS20 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Optio VS20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Optio VS20 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2012-01-25 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-560mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-4.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2500s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 2.80 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) | 235 gr (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 111 x 61 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | D-LI122 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Retail price | $1,700 | $106 |