Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Pentax Optio WG-2 front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
37
Overall
38

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
Pentax WG-2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
  • Launched February 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 Overview

In this article, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and WG-2 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WG-2 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M1 II was released 4 years later than the WG-2 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-2 being a Compact camera.

Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-M1 II scores versus the WG-2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax WG-2

 E-M1 II WG-2 
LaunchedSeptember 2016February 2012Fresher by 57 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k460kCrisper screen (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 WG-2 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-2

 E-M1 II WG-2 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II features exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Pentax WG-2 has measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 II against the WG-2.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and WG-2 is 68 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing simply by researching technical specs. The visual here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and WG-2.

As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will render greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
Pentax WG-2 as a Portrait photography camera
76
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has face detect focus
saves RAW files
40
manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
features face detection autofocus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Street photography with Pentax WG-2
78
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
includes focus by touch
weather sealing
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
great ISO range (25,600)
54
environment proofing
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Sports photography with Pentax WG-2
75
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
fast shooting (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
weather sealing
has phase detect auto focus
bad battery (350 shots)
38
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
environment proofing
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography info
Pentax WG-2 Travel photography info
72
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
weather sealing
includes focus by touch
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
display is selfie friendly
bad battery (350 CIPA)
70
environment proofing
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Landscape photography camera
Pentax WG-2 as a Landscape photography camera
76
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
does not have low pass filter
great ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather sealing
2 card slots
bad battery (350 per charge)
47
manual focus
really wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
MP count decent (16MP)
environment proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Vlogging camera
Pentax WG-2 as a Vlogging camera
79
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
has microphone support
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
30
really wide (28mm)
features face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
does not have external mic jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-2
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIPentax Optio WG-2
General Information
Company Olympus Pentax
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Pentax Optio WG-2
Category Pro Mirrorless Waterproof
Launched 2016-09-19 2012-02-07
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 125
RAW photos
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology - Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 5.40 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lb) 192 grams (0.42 lb)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 260 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Storage slots Dual Single
Pricing at launch $1,700 $350