Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Launched February 2012
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and WG-2 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WG-2 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 II was released 4 years later than the WG-2 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-2 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-M1 II scores versus the WG-2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Pentax Optio WG-2. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax WG-2
E-M1 II | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | February 2012 | Fresher by 57 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus E-M1 II
WG-2 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-2
E-M1 II | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II features exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Pentax WG-2 has measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 II against the WG-2.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and WG-2 is 68 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing simply by researching technical specs. The visual here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and WG-2.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will render greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2012-02-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 192 grams (0.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 260 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | Single |
Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $350 |