Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-3, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and WG-3 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WG-3 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.

The E-M1 II was unveiled 3 years later than the WG-3 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-M1 II scores vs the WG-3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Pentax WG-3. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Pentax WG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax WG-3
E-M1 II | WG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | July 2013 | More recent by 39 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Olympus E-M1 II
WG-3 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-3
E-M1 II | WG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II has got external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the WG-3.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and WG-3 is 68 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and WG-3.
As you can see, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will result in extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos much more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II will have a benefit in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax WG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax WG-3 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2013-07-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 3.40 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 240 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | Single |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $300 |