Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Pentax WG-3 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
  • New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Pentax WG-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Announced July 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 Overview

Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-3, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and WG-3 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WG-3 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M1 II was unveiled 3 years later than the WG-3 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-M1 II scores vs the WG-3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

				

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax WG-3

 E-M1 II WG-3 
AnnouncedSeptember 2016July 2013More recent by 39 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k460kSharper display (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 WG-3 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-3

 E-M1 II WG-3 
Manually focus More exact focus
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II has got external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the WG-3.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and WG-3 is 68 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and WG-3.

As you can see, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will result in extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos much more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II will have a benefit in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography details
Pentax WG-3 Portrait photography details
75
has manual focus
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
delivers RAW files
41
manual focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography highlights
Pentax WG-3 Street photography highlights
78
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
includes touch focus
weather sealing
lighter than average in class (574 grams)
great high ISO (25,600)
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography features
Pentax WG-3 Sports photography features
74
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
weather sealing
has phase detect auto focus
low battery life (350 per charge)
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low battery life (240 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography factors
Pentax WG-3 Travel photography factors
72
lighter than average in class (574g)
weather sealing
includes touch focus
decent MP (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
low battery life (350 CIPA)
72
environment sealing
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
low battery life (240 shots)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Landscape photography with Pentax WG-3
76
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
does not have anti aliasing filter
great high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather sealing
2 card slots
low battery life (350 CIPA)
54
manual focus
really wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
low battery life (240 per charge)
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging info
Pentax WG-3 Vlogging info
79
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focus
high video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
has external microphone support
lighter than average in class (574g)
36
really wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
missing mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax WG-3
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIPentax WG-3
General Information
Brand Olympus Pentax
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Pentax WG-3
Class Pro Mirrorless Waterproof
Released 2016-09-19 2013-07-19
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 125
RAW pictures
Min enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,037k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.40 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574g (1.27 lbs) 230g (0.51 lbs)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 240 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Storage slots Dual Single
Launch cost $1,700 $300