Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor sizes.

The E-M1 II was announced 5 years after the GR Digital IV which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-M1 II scores versus the GR Digital IV when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
E-M1 II | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | ![]() | September 2011 | More modern by 62 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus E-M1 II
GR Digital IV | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper display (+193k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh GR Digital IV
E-M1 II | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II vs the GR Digital IV.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and GR Digital IV is 68 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes purely by checking out specs. The picture here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and GR Digital IV.
All in all, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide extra detail with its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 390 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Price at release | $1,700 | $599 |