Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
47
Overall
39

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Revealed September 2016
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

In this article, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor sizes.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M1 II was announced 5 years after the GR Digital IV which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.

Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-M1 II scores versus the GR Digital IV when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 E-M1 II GR Digital IV 
LaunchedSeptember 2016September 2011More modern by 62 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus E-M1 II

 GR Digital IV E-M1 II 
Display resolution1230k1037kCrisper display (+193k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 E-M1 II GR Digital IV 
Focus manually More precise focus
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display dimensions

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M1 II versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II vs the GR Digital IV.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and GR Digital IV is 68 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes purely by checking out specs. The picture here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and GR Digital IV.

All in all, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide extra detail with its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography factors
75
you can focus manually
good megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
40
you can focus manually
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography info
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography info
78
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
comes with touch focus
weather proof
lighter than competition (574g)
good ISO range (25,600)
64
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography highlights
74
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
weather proof
comes with phase detect AF
terrible battery (350 per charge)
33
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great battery life (390 shots)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
has no phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography highlights
72
lighter than competition (574 grams)
weather proof
comes with touch focus
good megapixels (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
terrible battery (350 per charge)
67
great battery life (390 per charge)
flash built-in
good max aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Landscape photography camera
76
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
no anti-alias filter
good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
weather proof
has dual storage slots
terrible battery (350 per charge)
52
you can focus manually
good max aperture (f1.9)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
great battery life (390 CIPA)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 II
Vlogging with Ricoh GR Digital IV
79
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focusing
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 resolution)
does have external microphone jack
lighter than competition (574 grams)
29
good max aperture (f1.9)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIRicoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Ricoh GR Digital IV
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2016-09-19 2011-09-15
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 5184 x 3888 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW format
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture - f/1.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 4.8
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,037k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Optical (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 1 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.00 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 640x480
Video file format MOV, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 gr (1.27 lb) 190 gr (0.42 lb)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images 390 images
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 2 Single
Price at release $1,700 $599