Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR II

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Ricoh GR II front
Portability
89
Imaging
59
Features
55
Overall
57

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Revealed June 2015
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR II Overview

Here, we are matching up the Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR II, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and GR II (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and GR II (APS-C) offer totally different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The E-M1 II was released 16 months later than the GR II making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-M1 II scores against the GR II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Ricoh GR II

 E-M1 II GR II 
RevealedSeptember 2016June 2015Fresher by 16 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus E-M1 II

 GR II E-M1 II 
Display resolution1230k1037kSharper display (+193k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh GR II

 E-M1 II GR II 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Display size3"3"Same display measurements

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II has outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR II has proportions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II vs the GR II.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR II size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and GR II is 68 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by viewing technical specs. The visual below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and GR II.

As you have seen, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II because of its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh trickier and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Portrait photography with Ricoh GR II
75
has manual focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focus
supports RAW files
75
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has face detect focus
supports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GR II as a Street photography camera
78
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
features focus via touch
environment proof
lighter than others (574g)
above average ISO range (25,600)
74
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lighter than others (251 grams)
great ISO range (25,600)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography information
Ricoh GR II Sports photography information
74
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
environment proof
supports phase detect auto focus
terrible battery pack (350 CIPA)
50
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has tracking focus
focal length is fixed (28mm)
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography info
Ricoh GR II Travel photography info
72
lighter than others (574 grams)
environment proof
features focus via touch
decent megapixels (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
terrible battery pack (350 shots)
67
lighter than others (251 grams)
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GR II Landscape photography advice
76
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
no anti-alias filter
above average ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment proof
two card slots
terrible battery pack (350 per charge)
59
has manual focus
screen is a good size (3 inches)
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
lack of Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging information
Ricoh GR II Vlogging information
79
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
comes with microphone socket
lighter than others (574 grams)
32
has face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others (251g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
lack of microphone support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh GR II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh GR II
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIRicoh GR II
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Ricoh GR II
Type Pro Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2016-09-19 2015-06-17
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII GR Engine V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4928 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 25600 25600
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW format
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-16.0
Macro focusing range - 10cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,037k dots 1,230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Optical (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 300 secs
Max shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Max quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 60.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.00 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 gr (1.27 lb) 251 gr (0.55 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 80 80
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 23.6
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 13.7
DXO Low light rating 1312 1078
Other
Battery life 350 shots 320 shots
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Two One
Retail cost $1,700 $599