Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
58 Imaging
52 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 72mm
- Released January 2008
- Earlier Model is Samsung GX-10
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and GX-20 (15MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and GX-20 (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 II was brought out 8 years later than the GX-20 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung GX-20 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-M1 II grades vs the GX-20 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Samsung GX-20. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Samsung GX-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Samsung GX-20
| E-M1 II | GX-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2016 | January 2008 | More recent by 106 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-20 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| GX-20 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung GX-20
| E-M1 II | GX-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Samsung GX-20 has specifications of 142mm x 101mm x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") along with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the GX-20.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and GX-20 is 68 and 58 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading specifications. The visual underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and GX-20.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer you greater detail having its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung GX-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung GX-20 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2008-01-24 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4688 x 3120 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
| Video data format | MOV, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 800 gr (1.76 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 142 x 101 x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 80 | 68 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 23.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 11.2 |
| DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 714 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Two | 1 |
| Price at launch | $1,700 | $850 |