Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20
68 Imaging
58 Features
93 Overall
72
58 Imaging
52 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 72mm
- Released January 2008
- Earlier Model is Samsung GX-10
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and GX-20 (15MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and GX-20 (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M1 II was brought out 8 years later than the GX-20 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung GX-20 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-M1 II grades vs the GX-20 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Samsung GX-20. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Samsung GX-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Samsung GX-20
| E-M1 II | GX-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2016 | January 2008 | More recent by 106 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-20 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| GX-20 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung GX-20
| E-M1 II | GX-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Samsung GX-20 has specifications of 142mm x 101mm x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") along with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the GX-20.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and GX-20 is 68 and 58 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading specifications. The visual underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and GX-20.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer you greater detail having its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-20 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung GX-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung GX-20 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2008-01-24 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4688 x 3120 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
| Video data format | MOV, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 800 gr (1.76 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 142 x 101 x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 80 | 68 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 23.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 11.2 |
| DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 714 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Two | 1 |
| Price at launch | $1,700 | $850 |