Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ10W
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Other Name is WB500

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ10W, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and HZ10W (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and HZ10W (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizes.

The E-M1 II was manufactured 7 years after the HZ10W which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-M1 II scores vs the HZ10W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Samsung HZ10W. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Samsung HZ10W
E-M1 II | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | May 2009 | More modern by 90 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Olympus E-M1 II
HZ10W | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung HZ10W
E-M1 II | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II offers external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ10W has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ10W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the HZ10W.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and HZ10W is 68 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The image here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and HZ10W.
As you have seen, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will show greater detail due to its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung HZ10W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung HZ10W |
Otherwise known as | - | WB500 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2432 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 249 grams (0.55 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Pricing at release | $1,700 | $300 |