Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Samsung HZ50W front
Portability
70
Imaging
37
Features
44
Overall
39

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Samsung HZ50W
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
  • Released May 2010
  • Additionally referred to as WB5500
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W Overview

Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and HZ50W (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and HZ50W (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M1 II was brought out 6 years after the HZ50W which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the HZ50W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Samsung HZ50W

 E-M1 II HZ50W 
ReleasedSeptember 2016May 2010More modern by 78 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k230kCrisper screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Olympus E-M1 II

 HZ50W E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung HZ50W

 E-M1 II HZ50W 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Samsung HZ50W has dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II vs the HZ50W.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and HZ50W is 68 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching a spec sheet. The picture below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and HZ50W.

As you can see, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography highlights
Samsung HZ50W Portrait photography highlights
75
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
46
has manual focus
good MP (14MP)
exports RAW files
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography advice
Samsung HZ50W Street photography advice
78
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
provides touch to focus
environment proof
lighter than competition (574 grams)
great ISO range (25,600)
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography advice
Samsung HZ50W Sports photography advice
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
max fps high (60.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
environment proof
comes with phase detect autofocus
low battery power (350 shots)
48
amazing zoom range (26-676mm 26.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (14 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography features
Samsung HZ50W Travel photography features
72
lighter than competition (574g)
environment proof
provides touch to focus
megapixel count decent (20MP)
selfie friendly display
low battery power (350 per charge)
58
good MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (26mm)
great zoom (676mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography highlights
Samsung HZ50W Landscape photography highlights
76
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
great ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
environment proof
2 card slots
low battery power (350 per charge)
51
has manual focus
quite wide (26mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (14 megapixels)
exports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging info
Samsung HZ50W Vlogging info
79
selfie friendly display
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect autofocus
video res high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have mic support
lighter than competition (574 grams)
24
quite wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung HZ50W
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISamsung HZ50W
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Samsung HZ50W
Also Known as - WB5500
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2016-09-19 2010-05-03
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Maximum boosted ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 64
RAW format
Lowest boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-676mm (26.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-5.0
Macro focus range - 10cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,037k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 5.60 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video format MOV, H.264 H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 gr (1.27 pounds) 426 gr (0.94 pounds)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photos -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SC/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Dual 1
Cost at launch $1,700 $250