Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Released May 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB5500
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and HZ50W (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and HZ50W (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 II was brought out 6 years after the HZ50W which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the HZ50W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Samsung HZ50W. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Samsung HZ50W
E-M1 II | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | May 2010 | More modern by 78 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Olympus E-M1 II
HZ50W | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung HZ50W
E-M1 II | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Samsung HZ50W has dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II vs the HZ50W.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and HZ50W is 68 and 70 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching a spec sheet. The picture below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and HZ50W.
As you can see, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung HZ50W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung HZ50W |
Also Known as | - | WB5500 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2010-05-03 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) | 426 gr (0.94 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $250 |