Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung MV800

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Samsung MV800 front
Portability
97
Imaging
38
Features
43
Overall
40

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Announced September 2016
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Samsung MV800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
  • Launched September 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung MV800 Overview

In this article, we are comparing the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung MV800, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and MV800 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and MV800 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M1 II was introduced 5 years after the MV800 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera.

Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the MV800 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Samsung MV800

 E-M1 II MV800 
LaunchedSeptember 2016September 2011Newer by 62 months
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k460kSharper display (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 MV800 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung MV800

 E-M1 II MV800 
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display dimensions
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II offers physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung MV800 has proportions of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung MV800 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II and the MV800.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung MV800 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and MV800 is 68 and 97 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung MV800 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The pic below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and MV800.

As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung MV800 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung MV800 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography highlights
Samsung MV800 Portrait photography highlights
75
has manual focus
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
delivers RAW files
34
MP count good (16MP)
comes with face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography features
Samsung MV800 Street photography features
78
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
comes with focus via touch
environment sealing
lighter than competition (574g)
good ISO range (25,600)
73
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
offers touch focus
lighter than competition (121g)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
Samsung MV800 as a Sports photography camera
74
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
max fps high (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
environment sealing
comes with phase detect auto focus
bad battery life (350 shots)
44
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography details
Samsung MV800 Travel photography details
72
lighter than competition (574g)
environment sealing
comes with focus via touch
decent MP (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
bad battery life (350 CIPA)
71
lighter than competition (121g)
offers touch focus
MP count good (16MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (26mm)
missing Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography info
Samsung MV800 Landscape photography info
76
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
environment sealing
has dual storage slots
bad battery life (350 shots)
43
decently wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
no manual exposure
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging factors
Samsung MV800 Vlogging factors
79
display is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focus
high res video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
does have external microphone jack
lighter than competition (574g)
34
decently wide (26mm)
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect autofocus
lighter than competition (121g)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung MV800 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung MV800
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISamsung MV800
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Samsung MV800
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2016-09-19 2011-09-01
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW images
Lowest enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Tilting
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,037k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Max quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 60.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.20 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video file format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 grams (1.27 pounds) 121 grams (0.27 pounds)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 BP70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots Micro SD
Card slots 2 Single
Retail price $1,700 $499