Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma SD15
68 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
59 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma SD15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Announced February 2010
- Previous Model is Sigma SD14
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma SD15 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sigma SD15, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Sigma. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SD15 (5MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SD15 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M1 II was introduced 6 years after the SD15 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma SD15 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the SD15 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma SD15 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sigma SD15. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sigma SD15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sigma SD15
E-M1 II | SD15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | February 2010 | Newer by 81 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper display (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD15 over the Olympus E-M1 II
SD15 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sigma SD15
E-M1 II | SD15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma SD15 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II provides outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sigma SD15 has sizing of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") along with a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sigma SD15 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the SD15.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and SD15 is 68 and 59 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma SD15 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing technical specs. The picture here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and SD15.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer more detail using its extra 15MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma SD15 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma SD15 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sigma SD15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sigma SD15 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2010-02-20 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | True II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 2640 x 1760 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sigma SA |
Number of lenses | 107 | 76 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.6x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 750g (1.65 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Price at release | $1,700 | $1,500 |