Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A3000
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5aaf5/5aaf587e29a179629037a7974702d099625cbb1e" alt="Sony Alpha A3000 front Sony Alpha A3000 front"
69 Imaging
62 Features
54 Overall
58
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Introduced August 2013
- Successor is Sony a3500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A3000 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A3000, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the A3000 (20MP) is pretty close but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A3000 (APS-C) have different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M1 II was announced 3 years later than the A3000 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-M1 II grades versus the A3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A3000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sony Alpha A3000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sony A3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A3000
E-M1 II | A3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | August 2013 | Fresher by 38 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A3000 over the Olympus E-M1 II
A3000 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A3000
E-M1 II | A3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A3000 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II provides exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony A3000 has specifications of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") along with a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A3000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II against the A3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/634b2/634b252a6652e9820dc574e4248eec89a580b731" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A3000 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A3000 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and A3000 is 68 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e76a/0e76a0a9b7bfb9a4170a5aed809d76b58227b163" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A3000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing merely by looking through specs. The graphic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and A3000.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have the same resolution albeit different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II features the smaller sensor which will make getting bokeh harder. The more modern E-M1 II provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0083/d008343a37aec67a327afd47f4369ceca9c8d4d7" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A3000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19404/1940472d791186e40ff470323cd147cfe3707f17" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A3000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha A3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha A3000 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2013-08-27 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | BIONZ image |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5456 x 3632 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Number of lenses | 107 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.47x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | AVCHD, H.264, MP4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 411 gr (0.91 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 12.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 1068 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 470 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | - |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $398 |