Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Alpha A7R III front
Portability
63
Imaging
78
Features
93
Overall
84

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
Sony A7R III
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Increase to 102400)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 657g - 127 x 96 x 74mm
  • Released October 2017
  • Older Model is Sony A7R II
  • Replacement is Sony A7R IV
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III Overview

Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A7R III, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A7R III (42MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A7R III (Full frame) feature totally different sensor sizes.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The E-M1 II was introduced 13 months before the A7R III making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-M1 II scores vs the A7R III for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A7R III

 E-M1 II A7R III 
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Sony A7R III over the Olympus E-M1 II

 A7R III E-M1 II 
ReleasedOctober 2017September 2016Fresher by 13 months
Display resolution1440k1037kSharper display (+403k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A7R III

 E-M1 II A7R III 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II provides exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony A7R III has sizing of 127mm x 96mm x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") with a weight of 657 grams (1.45 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A7R III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II versus the A7R III.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and A7R III is 68 and 63 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III Sensor Comparison

Often, its hard to see the gap in sensor sizing simply by viewing specifications. The visual here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and A7R III.

To sum up, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony A7R III will result in greater detail using its extra 22 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-M1 II will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography advice
Sony A7R III Portrait photography advice
76
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
86
focusing manually
high megapixels (42MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
provides face detect focus
exports RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography features
Sony A7R III Street photography features
78
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
provides touch to focus
weather proof
lighter than competition (574g)
great ISO range (25,600)
79
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
exports RAW files
has touch focus
environment proof
very good ISO range (32,000)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography info
Sony A7R III Sports photography info
75
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
weather proof
comes with phase detect autofocus
bad battery power (350 per charge)
89
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
high megapixels (42MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
provides tracking focus
environment proof
better than average battery power (650 per charge)
has phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography information
Sony A7R III Travel photography information
72
lighter than competition (574g)
weather proof
provides touch to focus
megapixel count decent (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
bad battery power (350 shots)
74
better than average battery power (650 shots)
environment proof
supports bluetooth
has touch focus
high megapixels (42 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography details
Sony A7R III Landscape photography details
76
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
does not have anti-alias filter
great ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
weather proof
2 card slots
bad battery power (350 per charge)
87
focusing manually
change lenses (Sony E mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
high megapixels (42 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
does not have anti-alias filter
very good ISO range (32,000)
exports RAW files
environment proof
better than average battery power (650 CIPA)
has double storage slots
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging info
Sony A7R III Vlogging info
79
screen is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection autofocus
high video quality (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have external mic support
lighter than competition (574g)
37
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
has microphone port
screen isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A7R III
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Alpha A7R III
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Alpha A7R III
Type Pro Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Released 2016-09-19 2017-10-25
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 42 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 7952 x 5304
Highest native ISO 25600 32000
Highest boosted ISO - 102400
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW support
Lowest boosted ISO 64 50
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 121 425
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Total lenses 107 121
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,037k dot 1,440k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot 3,686k dot
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.78x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/8000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 3840x2160
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lb) 657 grams (1.45 lb)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 127 x 96 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 100
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 26.0
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 14.7
DXO Low light score 1312 3523
Other
Battery life 350 shots 650 shots
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 NP-FZ100
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures))
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots Two SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support on one)
Storage slots 2 2
Launch cost $1,700 $2,800