Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
63 Imaging
78 Features
93 Overall
84
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Increase to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 657g - 127 x 96 x 74mm
- Released October 2017
- Older Model is Sony A7R II
- Replacement is Sony A7R IV
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A7R III, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A7R III (42MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A7R III (Full frame) feature totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M1 II was introduced 13 months before the A7R III making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-M1 II scores vs the A7R III for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Alpha A7R III. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony A7R III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A7R III
E-M1 II | A7R III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony A7R III over the Olympus E-M1 II
A7R III | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2017 | September 2016 | Fresher by 13 months | |
Display resolution | 1440k | 1037k | Sharper display (+403k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A7R III
E-M1 II | A7R III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II provides exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony A7R III has sizing of 127mm x 96mm x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") with a weight of 657 grams (1.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A7R III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II versus the A7R III.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and A7R III is 68 and 63 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to see the gap in sensor sizing simply by viewing specifications. The visual here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and A7R III.
To sum up, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony A7R III will result in greater detail using its extra 22 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-M1 II will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7R III Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha A7R III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha A7R III |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2017-10-25 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 42 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 7952 x 5304 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 32000 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Total lenses | 107 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 1,440k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 3,686k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 657 grams (1.45 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 127 x 96 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 100 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 14.7 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 3523 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 650 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Two SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support on one) |
Storage slots | 2 | 2 |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $2,800 |