Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7c
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
78 Imaging
76 Features
88 Overall
80
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7c Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Raise to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 509g - 124 x 71 x 60mm
- Released September 2020
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7c Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7c, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the A7c (24MP) is pretty well matched but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A7c (Full frame) have totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M1 II was brought out 5 years prior to the A7c which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A7c being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the A7c when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7c Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Alpha A7c. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony A7c Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A7c
E-M1 II | A7c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1037k | 922k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A7c over the Olympus E-M1 II
A7c | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2020 | September 2016 | Newer by 48 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A7c
E-M1 II | A7c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7c Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II has external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony A7c has proportions of 124mm x 71mm x 60mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 2.4") and a weight of 509 grams (1.12 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7c in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II against the A7c.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and A7c is 68 and 78 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7c Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking specs. The pic here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and A7c.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A7c will resolve greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 II is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7c Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A7c Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha A7c | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha A7c |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2020-09-14 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Available lenses | 107 | 122 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully articulated |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lbs) | 509g (1.12 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 124 x 71 x 60mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 2.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 740 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $1,800 |