Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6100
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


81 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 396g - 120 x 67 x 59mm
- Revealed August 2019

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6100 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A6100, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the A6100 (24MP) is pretty similar but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A6100 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.

The E-M1 II was released 3 years earlier than the A6100 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A6100 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-M1 II grades versus the A6100 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6100 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sony Alpha a6100. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sony A6100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A6100
E-M1 II | A6100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 922k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A6100 over the Olympus E-M1 II
A6100 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2019 | ![]() | September 2016 | Newer by 35 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A6100
E-M1 II | A6100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both are selfie friendly | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6100 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony A6100 has dimensions of 120mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A6100 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II and the A6100.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and A6100 is 68 and 81 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6100 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading specifications. The picture here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and A6100.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Sony A6100 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 II is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6100 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6100 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha a6100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha a6100 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2019-08-28 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 32000 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Available lenses | 107 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 1,440k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 11.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Flash off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless, hi-speed |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 396g (0.87 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 120 x 67 x 59mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 420 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $748 |