Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 front
Portability
87
Imaging
33
Features
29
Overall
31

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony H20
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 38-380mm (F3.5-4.4) lens
  • 250g - 107 x 69 x 47mm
  • Launched May 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20 Overview

In this write-up, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony H20, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and H20 (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and H20 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-M1 II was announced 7 years later than the H20 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H20 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-M1 II scores versus the H20 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony H20

 E-M1 II H20 
LaunchedSeptember 2016May 2009More recent by 90 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k230kSharper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony H20 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 H20 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony H20

 E-M1 II H20 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II features external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony H20 has measurements of 107mm x 69mm x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony H20 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the H20.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and H20 is 68 and 87 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and H20.

As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II using its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer extra detail with its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
Sony H20 as a Portrait photography camera
75
manual focus
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focus
delivers RAW files
27
you can focus manually
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography info
Sony H20 Street photography info
78
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
provides touch to focus
environment proofing
lighter than average in class (574g)
very good ISO range (25,600)
51
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than average (250 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography information
Sony H20 Sports photography information
74
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
quiet mode (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
environment proofing
comes with phase detect auto focus
not so great battery life (350 per charge)
26
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography details
Sony H20 Travel photography details
72
lighter than average in class (574g)
environment proofing
provides touch to focus
good MP (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
not so great battery life (350 shots)
51
flash built-in
long reach (380mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than average (250 grams)
megapixel count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography advice
Sony H20 Landscape photography advice
76
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
does not have anti aliasing filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
environment proofing
has double storage slots
not so great battery life (350 shots)
36
you can focus manually
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging details
Sony H20 Vlogging details
79
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection focus
high video quality (4096 x 2160 resolution)
does have external microphone port
lighter than average in class (574g)
23
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic socket
heavier than average (250 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony H20
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-H20
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2016-09-19 2009-05-14
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 38-380mm (10.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-4.4
Macro focusing range - 2cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 7.10 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video data format MOV, H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 gr (1.27 lb) 250 gr (0.55 lb)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 107 x 69 x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 NP-BG1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots Dual One
Launch cost $1,700 $249