Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
87 Imaging
33 Features
29 Overall
31
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-380mm (F3.5-4.4) lens
- 250g - 107 x 69 x 47mm
- Launched May 2009
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony H20, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and H20 (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and H20 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M1 II was announced 7 years later than the H20 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H20 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-M1 II scores versus the H20 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony H20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony H20
E-M1 II | H20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | May 2009 | More recent by 90 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H20 over the Olympus E-M1 II
H20 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony H20
E-M1 II | H20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II features external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony H20 has measurements of 107mm x 69mm x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony H20 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the H20.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and H20 is 68 and 87 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and H20.
As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II using its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer extra detail with its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H20 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 38-380mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-4.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 7.10 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lb) | 250 gr (0.55 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 107 x 69 x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $249 |