Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H55
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
92 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H55 Overview
Below is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony H55, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and H55 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and H55 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 II was announced 6 years later than the H55 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H55 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M1 II grades against the H55 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H55 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sony H55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony H55
E-M1 II | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | June 2010 | More recent by 77 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H55 over the Olympus E-M1 II
H55 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony H55
E-M1 II | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H55 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II has outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony H55 has sizing of 103mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony H55 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II against the H55.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and H55 is 68 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H55 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching technical specs. The visual here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and H55.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H55 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H55 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 3.80 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Slow Syncro, Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lbs) | 200g (0.44 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 103 x 58 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $235 |