Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX100V

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V front
Portability
66
Imaging
39
Features
50
Overall
43

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX100V Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Announced September 2016
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony HX100V
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 577g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
  • Announced October 2011
  • Successor is Sony HX200V
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX100V Overview

The following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX100V, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and HX100V (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and HX100V (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-M1 II was announced 4 years after the HX100V which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX100V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the HX100V with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony HX100V

 E-M1 II HX100V 
AnnouncedSeptember 2016October 2011Newer by 60 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k921kSharper screen (+116k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony HX100V over the Olympus E-M1 II

 HX100V E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony HX100V

 E-M1 II HX100V 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX100V Physical Comparison

In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II features exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony HX100V has specifications of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") and a weight of 577 grams (1.27 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX100V in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the HX100V.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX100V size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and HX100V is 68 and 66 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX100V top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX100V Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through specs. The picture below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and HX100V.

All in all, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX100V sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX100V Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX100V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography highlights
Sony HX100V Portrait photography highlights
75
has manual focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focus
exports RAW files
39
manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography info
Sony HX100V Street photography info
78
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
includes focus by touch
weather sealing
lighter than competition in class (574g)
great ISO range (25,600)
50
screen tilts
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than competitors in class (577g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography highlights
Sony HX100V Sports photography highlights
74
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet mode (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
weather sealing
has phase detect auto focus
low battery power (350 shots)
49
amazing zoom range (27-810mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Travel photography camera
Sony HX100V as a Travel photography camera
72
lighter than competition in class (574g)
weather sealing
includes focus by touch
resolution is good (20MP)
selfie friendly display
low battery power (350 CIPA)
54
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (27mm)
long zoom (810mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors in class (577 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography highlights
Sony HX100V Landscape photography highlights
76
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
great ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
weather sealing
2 card slots
low battery power (350 per charge)
47
manual focus
decently wide (27mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging information
Sony HX100V Vlogging information
79
selfie friendly display
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
has external microphone support
lighter than competition in class (574g)
25
decently wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing mic jack
heavier than competitors in class (577g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX100V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony HX100V
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2016-09-19 2011-10-21
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 27-810mm (30.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-5.6
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Tilting
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dot 921 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 12.70 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lb) 577 grams (1.27 lb)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 2 One
Price at launch $1,700 $429